prakapovich

Что то подобное я всегда подозревал, но реальность превзошла даже мои ожидания:

1. верховный суд - a total innovation and fabrication dreamed up by Chief Justice John Marshall

2. его действия не должны распространяться на кейсы: "гражданин vs государство". Сам не поверил своим глазам, пока не перечитал 3 Статью:

"Recognizing this, the authors of the Constitution created the Court as a body designed to address only conflicts between states, or between individuals of different states. In other words, it was supposed to head off conflicts that could lead to crises between state governments; it was designed to prevent wars between states."

Ну и конечно всхлипы "консерваторов" по поводу безвозвратно покинувшего нас гения Скалиа - бредятина чистой воды. Просто невозможно в здравом уме воспринимать все judicial review Верховного Суда. Все это служит одному: "the Court serves an essential role in augmenting the power of the other branches of the federal government." И Скалиа верно стоял на страже этого бреда:

With the expected eulogies for Scalia among his supporters, we’re being berated with the idea that Scalia was an “originalist” who stuck doggedly to the clear text of the Constitution as imagined by its authors. In truth, Scalia was no originalist, since, if he had been one, he would have rejected the whole notion of judicial review, which is itself a total innovation and fabrication dreamed up by Chief Justice John Marshall. Absolutely nowhere does Article III of the Constitution (the part that deals with the court, and is half a page long) give the court the power to decide on what can be legal or not in every state, town, village or business of the United States. Moreover, as Jeff Deist notes today, the Court’s powers we so blithely accept as fait accompli are mostly made up:

The concept of judicial review is a fabrication by the Court, with no basis in Article III.
Constitutional jurisprudence is not constitutional law.
The Supreme Court is supreme only over lower federal courts: it is not supreme over other branches of government.
Congress plainly has constitutional authority to define and restrict the jurisdiction of federal courts.

https://mises.org/wire/abolish-supreme-court